Analysis of the Effectivines of Flipped Classroom Implementation Through WhatsApp, Web, and Google Classroom in Elementary Schools

Dzakiroh Fikriyyah; Ida Rindaningsih

doi:10.47494/mesb.2023.36.1784

(1) Dzakiroh Fikriyyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Indonesia
(2) Ida Rindaningsih Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47494/mesb.2023.36.1784

Keywords:

Flipped Classroom, Application, Student Learning Outcomes

Abstract

The Development Of Information Technology Can Change The Learning Model That Tends To Be Passive Into Active Learning With An Innovative Digital-Based Classroom Model. Learning Models That Are By Technological Development And Related To Learning Outside The Classroom And In The Classroom Are Needed. The Purpose Of The Study Was To Determine The Effectiveness Of Flipped Classroom Learning On The Learning Outcomes Of Elementary School Students. This Research Is Quantitative Research And Has Gone Through A Data Analysis Test. The Finding In This Study Is The Existence Of Flipped Cl Classroom Learning Flows On Whatsapp, Web, And Google Classroom. The Results Showed That There Were Variants Of Differences In Learning Results In Each Tool Used By Schools. The Findings In This Study Are Conducive Learning Flows Based On Flipped Classroom Studies And Learning Outcomes That Have Been Researched By Previous Researchers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Wulandari, M., “The Relationship Between Digital Literacy and Learning Outcomes of Elementary School Students,” Basicedu J., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 5890–5897, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://jbasic.org/index.php/basicedu

M. I. K. Tine Wulandari, “Introduction to Information and Communication Technology,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 2, pp. 9–17, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://repository.unikom.ac.id/56979/1/Pertemuan II.pdf

W. D. Rindaningsih, I., Findawati, Y., &; Hastutik, “Synchronous and Asynchronous with a Flipped learning environment in primary school,” Primary, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 33–44, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412972024.n2498.

H. Oktaviana, D., Wulandari, N., &; Hazwani, “The Influence Of The Question Student Learning Strategy Has With The Wheel Of Fortune Technique On Motivation,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10–19, 2022.

S. Khasanah, “Flipped Classroom Improves Higher Order Thinking Skills and Student Activeness During the Pandemic,” vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v8i1.413.

S. Jusuf, M., &; B. Nasaru, “Blended learning in improving chemistry learning outcomes using the flipped classroom model,” Pedagogika, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 102–113, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.37411/pedagogika.v13i1.1271.

K. Widyaningrum, R., &; Imbar, “Flipped Classroom in Message Perception and Design Course at UNJ Educational Technology Study Program,” J. Innov. Learn., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 49–53, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.21009/jpi.042.06.

Agustin Nur Laili, “The Effectiveness of the Flipped Classroom Model at SD Negeri Laweyan II SUmberasih, Probolinggo Regency,” Pedagogy, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 55, 2023.

M. Alimustofa, R., Elly, A., &; Luthfiana, “The Application of The Flipped Classroom Model Uses Mathematics Learning Videos to Measure The Ability to Understand The Concepts of Smp Negeri 1 Student,” LP3MKIL, vol. 3, pp. 1–7, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55526/ljse.v3i1.427.

E. Hatanti, U., Holisin, I., &; Suprapti, “Application of the Flipped Classroom Learning Method with a Scientific Approach Assisted by the WhatsApp Application in Mathematics Learning,” J. Educ. Teach., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 12–23, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v3i1.121.

T. Yulhendri, &; Kurniawati, “Web-based flipped learning on learning at Padang State University,” Osf.Io, pp. 1–12, 2019.

D. Concerned, I., &; Oktaviana, “Application of Blended Learning Using Google Classroom-Assisted Flipped Classroom Method to Mathematical Problem Solving Ability,” vol. 2, no. 15–25, 2022.

Morissan, “Survey Research Methods,” in International Encyclopedia of Education, 2018, pp. 152–160. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00296-7.

S. Rindaningsih, I., Setyosari, P., Kuswandi, D., &; Ulfa, “Development of seamless learning to facilitate formal and informal learning in elementary education,” New Educ. Rev., vol. 61, pp. 51–62, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2020.61.3.04.

R. Adawiah, “Through the talking stick method, it can improve the learning outcomes of class II moral creed MIN 1 Palangka Raya City,” Proc. Islam. Teach. Prof. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1102–1112, 2022.

A. Pebriyanti, N. M. S., Wena, M., &; Payadnya, “Differences in Mathematics Learning Outcomes of Students Taught with Flipped Classroom and Conventional Learning Strategies,” Mahasaraswati Natl. Semin. Math. Educ., pp. 15–25, 2020.

U. Usman, “Educational communication is based on blended learning in forming learning independence,” J. Journal., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 136–150, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.24252/jurnalisa.v4i1.5626.

M. I. Akbar, “Implementation of Android Package Mobile Web on the student council president election system,” pp. 1–8, 2023.

S. Kanedi, I., Utami, F. H., &; Asmar, “Utilization of Digital Literacy in Education Era 5.0,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 67–72, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37676/jdun.v2i1.3489.

A. A. Rahim, A., &; Fitri, “Analysis of online learning with the WhatsApp application of grade II students of the Islamic Ummah Haurgeulis Indramayu Elementary School,” vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 44–51, 2023.