Characterizing Monitoring in Heterogeneous Intercloud Environment


  • (1)  Ekta Dureja            Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, S.D. (PG) College, Panipat, India  
            India

    (*) Corresponding Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47494/mesb.v6i.122

Keywords:

Federation on Clouds, Amazon, Azure, FCM

Abstract

The heterogeneity of infrastructure, heterogeneity of interface, heterogeneity of objectives are few inherent features of a federation of clouds. To ensure the smooth and supportive interaction between various components or entities of the federation can only be ensured with the constant monitoring of each unit of federation. Monitoring in different clouds is undertaken in different styles and purpose. Commercial cloud like Amazon monitors for the optimal performance of resources. Microsoft Azure Cloud does monitor various activities for the user. Not only the purpose, but also the functionality of monitoring is different. The variety of methods and metrics for monitoring, objectives of monitoring in various federations motivated this study of monitoring subsystem. This analysis of monitoring component in diverse federation architectures is done with a view to highlight the effect of monitoring system in major federation architectures such as FCM (Federated Cloud Management).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

G. Eason, B. Noble, and I.N. Sneddon, “On certain integrals of Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. A247, pp. 529-551, April 1955.

E. Carlini, M. Coppola, P. Dazzi, L. Ricci, and G. Righetti. Cloud Federations in Contrail. Euro-Par 2011 Workshops, LNCS 7155, pp. 159168, 2012.

A. Keller and H. Ludwig. The WSLA framework: Specifying and monitoring service level agreements for web services. Journal of Network and Systems Management, 11(1), pp. 57–81, 2003.

J. Montes, A. Sanchez, B. Memishi, M. Perez, G. Antoniu. GMonE: A complete approach to cloud monitoring. Future Generation Computer Systems, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 5 March 2013.

Amazon CloudWatch. http://aws.amazon.com/cloudwatch/, 2009.

Cerebrata Azure Diagnostics Manager. http://www.cerebrata. com/Products/AzureDiagnosticsManager, 2011.

Nagios XI monitoring solution. http://www.nagios.com/products /nagiosxi/, 2012.

A. Cs. Marosi, G. Kecskemeti, A. Kertesz and P. Kacsuk. FCM: an Architecture for Integrating IaaS Cloud Systems. In Proceedings of The Second International Conference on Cloud Computing, GRIDs, and Virtualization. Rome, Italy. September, 2011.

Kertész, Attila, et al. "Enhancing federated cloud management with an integrated service monitoring approach." Journal of grid computing 11.4 (2013): 699-720.

Kecskemeti, Gabor, et al. "Facilitating self-adaptable Inter-Cloud management." Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing (PDP), 2012 20th Euromicro International Conference on. IEEE, 2012.

D. Villegas, N. Bobroff, I. Rodero, J. Delgado, Y. Liu, A. Devarakonda,L. Fong, S. Masoud Sadjadi, and M. Parashar, “Cloud federation in a layered service model,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 1330– 1344, 2012.

Demchenko, Y., C.Ngo, M.Makkes, R.Strijkers, C. de Laat, Defining Inter-Cloud Architecture for Interoperability and Integration. The 4th IEEE Conf on Cloud Computing, (CloudCom2012), 3-6 December, 2012, Taipei, Taiwan.

Published

2020-11-20

How to Cite

Dureja, E. . (2020). Characterizing Monitoring in Heterogeneous Intercloud Environment. Middle European Scientific Bulletin, 6, 127-130. https://doi.org/10.47494/mesb.v6i.122

Issue

Section

Education