Cooperative Learning Strategies Teachers Use in Facilitating the Comprehension of Geography in the North West and South Regions of Cameroon


  • (1)  Nkemngong Atemnkeng            Educationist/Researcher, National Centre for Education (CNE), South West Regional Center for Research and Innovation, Buea, Ministry of Scientific Research and Innovation, Cameroon  
            Cameroon

  • (2)  Ambei Moses Chu            Lecturer, The University of Bamenda , Faculty of Education, Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy, Cameroon  
            Cameroon

    (*) Corresponding Author

Keywords:

Cooperative learning strategies, teachers, comprehension of geography

Abstract

Cooperative learning is a teaching approach which has gained worldwide recognition over the years for its role in facilitating teaching and learning by both teachers and students. Cooperative learning on a broader scope is just one teaching method amongst many. There exist different cooperative learning strategies which can be contextualized depending on the teacher involved, the learners and the content of what has to be taught and learned. Each of these cooperative learning strategies has a specific impact on the learning process of the learners. It is therefore relevant for teachers to have knowledge of the respective cooperative learning strategies which can be made use of, in order to facilitate learning. This study therefore, seeks to investigate the cooperative learning strategies teachers use in facilitating the comprehension of geography in secondary schools in the North West and South West Regions of Cameroon. It focused on Fako and Meme Divisions in the South West Region and Mezam Division in the North West Region. The research objective was further turned to research question. The study was both a qualitative and quantitative research.The descriptive survey research design was adopted with a sample size of 138 geography teachers and 536 students. A questionnaire was the main instrument for data collection with reliability of 0.07 coefficient Cronbach alpha. The data was analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. Data were entered using EpiData version 3.1 and exported to SPSS version 25.0. Quantitative data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistical tools while qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis approach. Findings of the study revealed that, 31.23% of teachers and 22.96% of students hardly used the cooperative learning strategies. Based on these findings, it was recommended that training seminars and workshops should be organized for in-service teachers and a training course on cooperative learning and its different strategies be introduced in teacher training colleges. Teachers should also make an effort to read about cooperative learning and constantly practice the method of teaching.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, D., & Hamm, M. (1996). Cooperative learning, critical thinking and collaboration across the curriculum (2nd ed.). Springfield: Charles Thomas.

Cottell, Phillip & Mellis (1994). Complex cooperative learning structures for College and University courses to improve the academy. 304.

Effandi, Z., & Zanaton, I. (2007). Promoting cooperative learning in science and mathematics education: A Malaysian perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1), 35–39.

Hamby Towns, M., & Grant, E. R. (1997). “I believe I will go out of this class actually knowing something”: Cooperative learning activities in physical chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(8), 819–835. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199710)34:8<819::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-Y.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1990). Cooperative learning and achievement. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 23–37). New York: Praeger.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social Interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher. 38(5), 365-379

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. S. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota. (2014, July 3). Retrieved from: http://jamyang.wikispaces.com/file/view/Cooperative+Learning+Methods.doc

Jones, G. (1990). Cognitive conflict and cooperative learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 319 598.

Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Clement, CA: Resources for teachers , Inc

Kagan, S., and M. Kagan (1998). “Staff development and the structural appoach to cooperative learning.” In professional development for cooperative learning: issues and approaches, edited by C. M. Brody and N. Davison, 103–121. Albany: Suny Press.

Sharan, S. (1990). Cooperative learning: A perspective on research and practice. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 285–298). New York: Praeger.

Sharan, S. (2002). Differentiating methods of cooperative learning in research and practice. Asia Pacific journal of Education, 22, 106-116.

Sharan, Y. (2010). “Cooperative learning for academic and social gains: Valued pedagogy, problematic practice.” European Journal of Education, 45 (2): 300–313..

Slavin R, E., (1991): Synthesis of research of cooperative learning. Educational Leadership 48, 71-82

Slavin, R.E. (1994). Using student team learning (2nd Ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.

Published

2022-10-18

How to Cite

Atemnkeng, N. ., & Chu, A. M. . (2022). Cooperative Learning Strategies Teachers Use in Facilitating the Comprehension of Geography in the North West and South Regions of Cameroon. Middle European Scientific Bulletin, 29, 115-127. Retrieved from https://cejsr.academicjournal.io/index.php/journal/article/view/1554

Issue

Section

Education