Correctness and Appropriacy


    (*) Corresponding Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47494/mesb.v20i.1046

Keywords:

aims, language, perform, learn, teaching, produce

Abstract

The article is an attempt to clarify certain issues that seem to me to arise from adopting a communicative approach to the teaching of language. I have in mind, in particular, the teaching of English to speakers of other languages. Over recent years I (and a number of others) have advocated such an approach in principle and have tried to put it into practice in the preparation of teaching materials. In principle and practice, however, there always seemed to be loose ends of one sort or another: inconsistencies, unexamined assumptions, unresolved difficulties. My aim in this article was to sort out some of the things that I had been saying, consider their implications more closely, and see if they might be ordered into a coherent account. I wanted to try to think things through.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J.P.B Allen and S. Pit Corder, Oxford University Press, 1975, pp.37-40.

Babbie, E.R. 1973. Survey Research Methods. Belmont, C A.: Wadsworth.

Brian Tiffen and H. G. Widdowson: Language in Education, Oxford University Press, 1968.

Gay, L.R. 1981. Educational Research. Columbus, Ohio: Merill.

Herbert W. Seliger and Elana Shohamy: Second Language research methods 1989. 270 p.

The most detailed treatment is to be found in W. F. Mackey: Language Teaching Analysis, Longman, 1965, pp.137 et seq.

The criteria discussed by Mackey are: frequency, range, availability, coverage, learnability. See also Chapters 29-31 of my Language Teaching Texts, Oxford University Press, 1971.

Published

2022-01-28

How to Cite

Correctness and Appropriacy. (2022). Middle European Scientific Bulletin, 20, 180-183. https://doi.org/10.47494/mesb.v20i.1046

Issue

Section

Education